Performance testing jobs in 2026 — demand, top roles hiring, and related skills
As of 2026-11-05, Performance testing appears in 1,710 job postings indexed by Skillenai over the past 90 days — Software Engineer has the most postings mentioning Performance testing, with demand share up 2.0% vs the prior 4 weeks.
Last updated · 90d ending 2026-11-05
Which roles want Performance testing?
Upload your resume and Skillenai will show which roles your Performance testing experience fits, which skills you already cover, and what is missing.
Frequently asked questions about Performance testing
+Is Performance testing in demand in 2026?
Yes. Performance testing appears in 1,710 job postings indexed by Skillenai over the 90 days ending 2026-11-05. Software Engineer accounts for the most postings mentioning Performance testing (16.2% of all postings mentioning Performance testing).
+What jobs require Performance testing?
According to the Skillenai jobs index over the 90 days ending 2026-11-05, among roles with at least 20 postings, the highest shares mentioning Performance testing are Performance Test Engineer (75.0% of that role’s postings mention Performance testing), Software Test Automation Engineer (34.5% of that role’s postings mention Performance testing), Test Architect (32.0% of that role’s postings mention Performance testing).
+What skills are commonly paired with Performance testing?
Across job postings indexed by Skillenai (90 days ending 2026-11-05), Performance testing most often appears alongside CI/CD, test automation, Python, regression testing, integration testing.
+Where is Performance testing most in demand?
As of 2026-11-05, the metro areas posting the most jobs requiring Performance testing are Bengaluru, Pune, Hyderabad, Nashville, London, according to the Skillenai jobs index.
+How can I keep up with new Performance testing content and jobs?
Skillenai indexes news, blog posts, and research papers mentioning Performance testing alongside the jobs index. You can subscribe to a daily email digest of new Performance testing content from your Skillenai account.
+Which skills come before and after Performance testing?
The skill-flow chart shows skills documented in adjacent positions across observed employer changes. An outgoing skill is documented in the following position but not the preceding one. These are ideas to explore, not proven prerequisites, acquisition dates, or levels of mastery. Each ribbon counts employer moves with that skill pair; one move can contribute several pairs.
Weekly indexed postings requiring Performance testing — last 90 days
Salary distribution
Box = 25th–75th percentile · tick = median · whisker = 10th–90th · USD, annualized
Career paths around Performance testing
Skills documented before and after this skill across employer changes.
Historical career profiles · all locations
Skills before Performance testing
Skills after Performance testing
How to read this chart · view counts
Each side is an independent set of observed employer moves, not the same people followed through three stages. Ribbon widths compare move counts within that side. Internal moves are not included.
The following position documents a skill that the preceding position does not. Skills must be linked to both positions, with clear dates and no overlap. One move can connect several skill pairs. These patterns suggest skills to explore; they do not establish prerequisites, when a skill was learned, or a higher skill level.
Source: Skillenai talent graph, historical career profiles. Historical descriptions and coverage can change. Only the leading published connections are shown.
| Connection | Moves |
|---|---|
| Before: Java | 15 |
| Before: Jenkins | 14 |
| Before: sql | 12 |
| Before: selenium webdriver | 12 |
| Before: Functional Testing | 10 |
| Before: Selenium | 10 |
| Before: regression testing | 9 |
| Before: python | 8 |
| After: Jira | 13 |
| After: Agile | 11 |
| After: sql | 9 |
| After: API testing | 8 |
| After: test cases | 8 |
| After: Selenium | 8 |
| After: TestNG | 8 |
| After: Postman | 7 |
Roles most likely to require Performance testing
Among roles with at least 20 postings in the same period.
| Role | Postings mentioning skill | % of role postings mentioning skill |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Test Engineer | 24 | 75.0% |
| Software Test Automation Engineer | 10 | 34.5% |
| Test Architect | 8 | 32.0% |
| Quality Test Engineer | 10 | 30.3% |
| QA Manager | 8 | 28.6% |
| Software Development Engineer in Test (SDET) | 24 | 22.9% |
| Software Tester | 5 | 21.7% |
| Core Infrastructure Engineer | 9 | 20.5% |
| QA Test Engineer | 8 | 20.0% |
| Software Development Test Engineer | 6 | 20.0% |
Roles with the most Performance testing postings
| Role | Postings mentioning skill | Share of skill postings |
|---|---|---|
| Software Engineer | 277 | 16.2% |
| QA Engineer | 162 | 9.5% |
| Test Engineer | 87 | 5.1% |
| QA Automation Engineer | 66 | 3.9% |
| Software Test Engineer | 50 | 2.9% |
| Quality Assurance Engineer | 37 | 2.2% |
| Software Development Engineer in Test | 37 | 2.2% |
| Test Automation Engineer | 36 | 2.1% |
| SDET | 29 | 1.7% |
| Software Engineer in Test | 28 | 1.6% |
Top companies posting jobs requiring Performance testing
Employers ranked by indexed job postings in the last 90 days.
| Company | Postings · 90 days |
|---|---|
| Mastercard | 35 |
| Cisco | 30 |
| Ghr | 29 |
| Opower | 25 |
| Fiserv | 19 |
| NVIDIA | 18 |
| DraftKings | 16 |
| Barclays | 15 |
| Webroot | 14 |
| Elsevier | 12 |
Job postings indexed over the past 90 days, grouped by resolved employer. Counts are postings, not hires. Companies without a published page appear without a link.
Top metros hiring for Performance testing
| Name | Postings | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Bengaluru | 64 | 3.7% |
| Pune | 53 | 3.1% |
| Hyderabad | 37 | 2.2% |
| Nashville | 32 | 1.9% |
| London | 27 | 1.6% |
| New York City | 26 | 1.5% |
| Toronto | 17 | 1.0% |
| Chennai | 14 | 0.8% |
| Austin | 13 | 0.8% |
Skills commonly paired with Performance testing
Explore related pages
How this was computed
Weekly job-count charts omit the incomplete current week (weeks start Monday, UTC). Totals include all postings in the stated window. Counts derive from the Skillenai jobs index over the 90 days ending 2026-11-05. Skills are resolved against the Skillenai canonical taxonomy, so the same entity is counted whether a posting writes 'Python', 'Python 3', or 'python'. Role prevalence divides postings mentioning Performance testing by all postings for each role in the same window, ranking roles with at least 20 postings. Role distribution divides each role’s Performance testing postings by all Performance testing postings, including postings without a role. Shares need not sum to 100% for the displayed roles. Pages refresh weekly (or daily for the top-50 most-requested skills). Adjusted posting share: 0.6% to 0.6%. Demand share change is the relative percentage change between these adjusted shares. Each employer-and-ATS group has at least 10 postings in each 90-day window; its earlier posting count supplies the same weight in both windows. The panel includes 2,472 identified employers and covers 71% of earlier and 70% of latest indexed postings. Windows: 2026-07-07 to 2026-10-05 and 2026-08-04 to 2026-11-02 (UTC; end dates excluded). The windows overlap by 62 days. Dates reflect indexing, not the employer’s posting date. This measures posting mix, not total hiring or market-wide demand. Matching excludes entrants and exits; changes in crawl completeness within an employer or ATS can still affect the result.
- source
- Skillenai jobs index, deduplicated daily
- entity_id
- 7bbf4afb0dc132ab
- data_as_of
- 2026-11-05
- window_days
- 90