adversarial testing jobs in 2026 — demand, top roles hiring, and related skills
As of 2026-11-07, adversarial testing appears in 218 job postings indexed by Skillenai over the past 90 days — AI Security Engineer has the most postings mentioning adversarial testing, with demand share down 3.0% vs the prior 4 weeks.
Last updated · 90d ending 2026-11-07
Which roles want adversarial testing?
Upload your resume and Skillenai will show which roles your adversarial testing experience fits, which skills you already cover, and what is missing.
Frequently asked questions about adversarial testing
+Is adversarial testing in demand in 2026?
Yes. adversarial testing appears in 218 job postings indexed by Skillenai over the 90 days ending 2026-11-07. AI Security Engineer accounts for the most postings mentioning adversarial testing (8.7% of all postings mentioning adversarial testing).
+What jobs require adversarial testing?
According to the Skillenai jobs index over the 90 days ending 2026-11-07, among roles with at least 20 postings, the highest shares mentioning adversarial testing are AI Safety Evaluator (23.3% of that role’s postings mention adversarial testing), AI Evaluation Engineer (13.6% of that role’s postings mention adversarial testing), AI Security Engineer (11.3% of that role’s postings mention adversarial testing).
+What skills are commonly paired with adversarial testing?
Across job postings indexed by Skillenai (90 days ending 2026-11-07), adversarial testing most often appears alongside Python, red-teaming, threat modeling, prompt injection, CI/CD.
+Where is adversarial testing most in demand?
As of 2026-11-07, the metro areas posting the most jobs requiring adversarial testing are San Francisco, London, New York City, Lexington, Mountain View, according to the Skillenai jobs index.
+How can I keep up with new adversarial testing content and jobs?
Skillenai indexes news, blog posts, and research papers mentioning adversarial testing alongside the jobs index. You can subscribe to a daily email digest of new adversarial testing content from your Skillenai account.
+Which skills come before and after adversarial testing?
The skill-flow chart shows skills documented in adjacent positions across observed employer changes. An outgoing skill is documented in the following position but not the preceding one. These are ideas to explore, not proven prerequisites, acquisition dates, or levels of mastery. Each ribbon counts employer moves with that skill pair; one move can contribute several pairs.
Weekly indexed postings requiring adversarial testing — last 90 days
Salary distribution
Box = 25th–75th percentile · tick = median · whisker = 10th–90th · USD, annualized
Career paths around adversarial testing
Skills documented before and after this skill across employer changes.
Historical career profiles · all locations
Skills before adversarial testing
Skills after adversarial testing
No published outgoing skill pairs yet.
How to read this chart · view counts
Each side is an independent set of observed employer moves, not the same people followed through three stages. Ribbon widths compare move counts within that side. Internal moves are not included.
The following position documents a skill that the preceding position does not. Skills must be linked to both positions, with clear dates and no overlap. One move can connect several skill pairs. These patterns suggest skills to explore; they do not establish prerequisites, when a skill was learned, or a higher skill level.
Source: Skillenai talent graph, historical career profiles. Historical descriptions and coverage can change. Only the leading published connections are shown.
| Connection | Moves |
|---|---|
| Before: NLP | 2 |
| Before: test planning | 1 |
| Before: ci/cd | 1 |
| Before: Kubeflow | 1 |
| Before: OCR | 1 |
| Before: technical specifications | 1 |
| Before: user accessibility | 1 |
| Before: notifications | 1 |
Roles most likely to require adversarial testing
Among roles with at least 20 postings in the same period.
| Role | Postings mentioning skill | % of role postings mentioning skill |
|---|---|---|
| AI Safety Evaluator | 7 | 23.3% |
| AI Evaluation Engineer | 3 | 13.6% |
| AI Security Engineer | 19 | 11.3% |
| AI Security Researcher | 3 | 9.4% |
| Research Program Manager | 2 | 9.1% |
| Quality Automation Engineer | 2 | 8.3% |
| Quality Assurance Tester | 1 | 5.0% |
| AI Trainer | 5 | 3.4% |
| ML Research Engineer | 1 | 2.9% |
| AI Evaluation Expert | 1 | 1.8% |
Roles with the most adversarial testing postings
| Role | Postings mentioning skill | Share of skill postings |
|---|---|---|
| AI Security Engineer | 19 | 8.7% |
| Security Engineer | 16 | 7.3% |
| Software Engineer | 13 | 6.0% |
| AI Safety Evaluation Expert | 8 | 3.7% |
| AI Safety Evaluator | 7 | 3.2% |
| QA Automation Engineer | 7 | 3.2% |
| AI Safety Specialist | 6 | 2.8% |
| Research Scientist | 6 | 2.8% |
| AI Trainer | 5 | 2.3% |
| Research Engineer | 5 | 2.3% |
Top companies posting jobs requiring adversarial testing
Employers ranked by indexed job postings in the last 90 days.
| Company | Postings · 90 days |
|---|---|
| OpenBrain | 26 |
| Mercor | 8 |
| CrowdStrike | 6 |
| Cisco | 6 |
| Decagon | 5 |
| MIT Lincoln Laboratory | 5 |
| ServiceNow | 5 |
| OpenAI | 4 |
| NVIDIA | 4 |
| Scale AI | 4 |
Job postings indexed over the past 90 days, grouped by resolved employer. Counts are postings, not hires. Companies without a published page appear without a link.
Top metros hiring for adversarial testing
| Name | Postings | Share |
|---|---|---|
| San Francisco | 14 | 6.4% |
| London | 8 | 3.7% |
| New York City | 7 | 3.2% |
| Lexington | 5 | 2.3% |
| Mountain View | 4 | 1.8% |
| Toronto | 4 | 1.8% |
| Brooklyn | 3 | 1.4% |
| Charlotte | 3 | 1.4% |
| Ho Chi Minh City | 3 | 1.4% |
Skills commonly paired with adversarial testing
Explore related pages
How this was computed
Weekly job-count charts omit the incomplete current week (weeks start Monday, UTC). Totals include all postings in the stated window. Counts derive from the Skillenai jobs index over the 90 days ending 2026-11-07. Skills are resolved against the Skillenai canonical taxonomy, so the same entity is counted whether a posting writes 'Python', 'Python 3', or 'python'. Role prevalence divides postings mentioning adversarial testing by all postings for each role in the same window, ranking roles with at least 20 postings. Role distribution divides each role’s adversarial testing postings by all adversarial testing postings, including postings without a role. Shares need not sum to 100% for the displayed roles. Pages refresh weekly (or daily for the top-50 most-requested skills). Adjusted posting share: 0.1% to 0.1%. Demand share change is the relative percentage change between these adjusted shares. Each employer-and-ATS group has at least 10 postings in each 90-day window; its earlier posting count supplies the same weight in both windows. The panel includes 2,471 identified employers and covers 71% of earlier and 70% of latest indexed postings. Windows: 2026-07-07 to 2026-10-05 and 2026-08-04 to 2026-11-02 (UTC; end dates excluded). The windows overlap by 62 days. Dates reflect indexing, not the employer’s posting date. This measures posting mix, not total hiring or market-wide demand. Matching excludes entrants and exits; changes in crawl completeness within an employer or ATS can still affect the result.
- source
- Skillenai jobs index, deduplicated daily
- entity_id
- e5c151bd36074647
- data_as_of
- 2026-11-07
- window_days
- 90